Shortcut to rasem2_logo.htm
Partner Retreat
SEM Logo

 

Home
About RASEM
Applications
Campus Barriers
Contact Information
RASEM FAQ
Mentor Program
Partners
Partner Retreat
Que Pasa RASEM
RASSI
Resources
Site Map
RASEM Staff
Teacher Outreach
Teacher Of The Year
Teaching Resources
Text Only Pages

 

Participant Evaluation of Third Annual RASEM2 Partner Retreat

The following chart summarizes evaluations made by participants and the comments are typical responses to each question.

  Excellent(%) VeryGood(%) Average(%) Poor(%)
The Retreat as a Whole
58 42 0 0
Individual Sessions
27 33 30 0
Food/Beverage Functions
78 19 03 0
Handling of Arrangements
74 14 09 03
Choice of Location
74 23 03 0
Hotel Accommodations /Service
62 19 19 0
Agenda and Schedule
58 21 21 0
Conference Materials
76 09 15 0
Quality of Presentations
52 33 15 0
Cost of Conference
90 04 06 0
Overall Observations
61 39 0 0

What parts of the Retreat were the most valuable/useful to you?

  • The guest speakers were inspiring. I feel like I can use what they said in class. (Dave Kammeyer and Glenn Mc.Intyre were the Keynote and Guest Speakers respectively)
  • The interactions between myself and the other conferees. Loved Glenn McIntyre's talk.
  • The TOP conference and the hands on rocket fun.
  • I realize that I knew very little about things involving people with disabilities.
  • Those sessions, I can apply to my elementary (kinder) classroom and new contacts I made.

What parts of the Retreat were the least valuable/useful to you?

  • Seemed to be geared toward moving into the work place. Need more middle school activities.
  • Presentations not really fitted towards elementary education.

Were some parts overemphasized? Underemphasized?

  • Probably some sessions need more time to discuss their topic.
  • I would like to a teenage disabled student do one of the speeches so that more teachers can hear from them the challenges that they face.
  • It would be great to have real conversations about lack of motivation in SPED students and ways to deal with it in the classroom.

What topics would you like to see added?

  • Sessions broken down by what level of students they will be addressing.
  • I would like to see more materials and guidance that I can take directly to the middle school classroom. Most sessions did not have handouts on materials.
  • Show the teachers how these modifications can help a child to overcome their needs.
  • Some classes/ seminars that focus on elementary education. Hands on Science and/ or math activities for teachers!!
  • Biology- since it is required to graduate from high school. Also – algebra and geometry?
  • Extend to all day Thursday so overlapping is less (offer same class in am/ pm, so half the group goes in the am and the other half goes in the pm, or something like that)
  • More practical applications on implementing the best practices in the classroom and overcoming the challenge of student apathy in SPED and regular students.
  • More description for each session. Much more hands on, take home activities or session. More ideas for math/ science activities for K – 6th grade students. How can the teacher adapt student activities for physically challenged students?
  • More “hands on” examples – making rockets was great!! (Thanks so much to my coach – he was very helpful)

Additional Comments:

  • I was disappointed when I did not get to see the posters. By 3:00, they were taken down and it was scheduled to be available until 5:00.
  • Please give more info about Saturday session – I have no idea what TOP workshop is, nor could anyone tell me Friday afternoon.
  • It would be nice if agenda/ schedule noted who the presentation was geared towards (e.g. higher learning, elementary teachers, students, etc.)

 

“This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Cooperative agreement No. HRD 0124198 and HRD 0622930.”

“Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.”

Site Last Updated: January 15, 2008